There was a challenge to not LIMIT my thinking on how large the AIESEC Madison LC can be by looking at its past. This translates to ONE meaning: Don't set a limit on how many members can be apart of AIESEC Madison.
There was also a challenge/realization that even with the "large" growth of the local committee in the last year, the committee found a way to SUSTAIN all of these new people. And so if the committee continued on a strong growth rate, the existing members would be able to come up with a structure to SUSTAIN the membership.
And so the only logical conclusion to how many new students must be accepted into the organization next semester, should be a fairly large number, as the LC can most definitely SUSTAIN them.
Then there were some concerns raised about growing the local committee, but only as far as could be SUSTAINABLE, as if the LC would explode into nothingness when that one extra member was accepted into the organization. Based on the above logic, all growth is sustainable (so long as someone miraculously came up with a structure to support all those people).
Well, right now, I guarantee I would be able to find a structure that would SUSTAIN over 400 members of AIESEC Madison. And I would even help implementing it, if I needed to.
And so, unlike the title of this post, I do not believe growing AIESEC Madison to 400 members will doom the LC to complete failure.
And yet, I still believe in a recruitment drive of -10 (yes negative) new members. I challenge you to find my logic.
There was also a challenge/realization that even with the "large" growth of the local committee in the last year, the committee found a way to SUSTAIN all of these new people. And so if the committee continued on a strong growth rate, the existing members would be able to come up with a structure to SUSTAIN the membership.
And so the only logical conclusion to how many new students must be accepted into the organization next semester, should be a fairly large number, as the LC can most definitely SUSTAIN them.
Then there were some concerns raised about growing the local committee, but only as far as could be SUSTAINABLE, as if the LC would explode into nothingness when that one extra member was accepted into the organization. Based on the above logic, all growth is sustainable (so long as someone miraculously came up with a structure to support all those people).
Well, right now, I guarantee I would be able to find a structure that would SUSTAIN over 400 members of AIESEC Madison. And I would even help implementing it, if I needed to.
And so, unlike the title of this post, I do not believe growing AIESEC Madison to 400 members will doom the LC to complete failure.
And yet, I still believe in a recruitment drive of -10 (yes negative) new members. I challenge you to find my logic.
